Difference between revisions of "Translations:Setup Fcitx 5/27/zh-cn"

Latest revision as of 03:18, 18 March 2024

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Setup Fcitx 5)

Some may argue that <code>~/.profile</code> is a shell agnostic solution, which is wrong. While GDM always source this file, SDDM/Bash would not source this file if <code>~/.bash_profile</code> presents. This makes <code>~/.bash_profile</code> a better solution because bash is quite widely used. But check your login shell before proceeding, some distribution may not use bash as default shell.

Some may argue that <code>~/.profile</code> is a shell agnostic solution, which is wrong. While GDM always source this file, SDDM/Bash would not source this file if <code>~/.bash_profile</code> presents. This makes <code>~/.bash_profile</code> a better solution because bash is quite widely used. But check your login shell before proceeding, some distribution may not use bash as default shell.

Translation有些人可能会认为 <code>~/.profile</code> 是一个与 shell 无关的解决方案，这是错误的。虽然 GDM 始终获取此文件，但如果 <code>~/.bash_profile</code> 存在，SDDM/Bash 将不会获取此文件。这使得 <code>~/.bash_profile</code> 成为更好的解决方案，因为 bash 的使用相当广泛。但在继续之前请检查您的登录 shell，某些发行版可能不使用 bash 作为默认 shell。

有些人可能会认为 ~/.profile 是一个与 shell 无关的解决方案，这是错误的。虽然 GDM 始终获取此文件，但如果 ~/.bash_profile 存在，SDDM/Bash 将不会获取此文件。这使得 ~/.bash_profile 成为更好的解决方案，因为 bash 的使用相当广泛。但在继续之前请检查您的登录 shell，某些发行版可能不使用 bash 作为默认 shell。

Difference between revisions of "Translations:Setup Fcitx 5/27/zh-cn"

Latest revision as of 03:18, 18 March 2024

Navigation menu

Search